(Picture credit: "Home Alone" movie)

Following PCRD’s special dividend announced beginning this month, another one of our earlier deep value picks, Chuan Hup Holdings (“CHH”), has also followed suit by proposing an impressive payout of its own. CHH is aiming to distribute a massive S$0.09 per share to its shareholders, equivalent to a 26.5% yield based on its last closing price of S$0.34.

This follows the Company's decision in January to divest its entire 76.7% stake in cash-rich subsidiary PCI Ltd for S$203 million to private equity outfit, Platinum Equity Advisors. The deal is subject to the approvals of:

1. PCI shareholders under a court-sanctioned Scheme of Arrangement pursuant to the Companies Act of Singapore; as well as
2. CHH shareholders in an EGM to be held in the coming weeks.

 
However, with the undertaking from CHH to vote in favour of the scheme, the Peh family controlling more than 50% of CHH shares, as well as the sweetener of the dividend payout for CHH shareholders, we expect both sets of shareholders to vote overwhelmingly in favour of the deal.

Tracing back to the time we issued our initial report in early 2015 when CHH’s share price was trading at S$0.305, the minority-friendly Company has either proposed or distributed a total of S$0.17 in dividends to date.

​In this regard, we commend the Company’s efforts to consistently reward its shareholders and urge more cash-rich companies to follow suit.

Related: http://stockresearchasia.com/latest-recommendations/chuan-hup-holdings-ltd-deep-value-emerging

It has been a little more than a year since we set up stockresearchasia.com in early 2015 to provide Asia based investors with proprietary stock research. While we did not envision it at the beginning, 2015 has turned out on hindsight to be a tricky year for investors to navigate in Asian equity markets. And 2016, for now at least, has proven to be far worse. Many Asian markets have plunged in tandem with the global markets to levels last seen in 2012 or earlier, led by China and exacerbated by an oil price collapse. It is hard to predict when the malaise would end except it inevitably will. As Herb Stein famously remarked and we agree, “If something cannot go on forever, it will stop.” In the meantime, we should see the market throw up good buying opportunities, ones that we hopefully can continue to exploit to our advantage.

It is against this backdrop that we are proud to say that our calls in the last year or so have mostly been spot on.  To recap, we have made outright recommendations on six stocks, five listed on SGX (Memstar, Chuan Hup, PCRD, MILF, IPC) and one on Bursa (Abric). We have also, when deemed fit, made a few situational analyses (Falcon Energy, Kejuruteraan Samudra Timur, Tiger Airways), giving investors some insights into ongoing corporate actions or potential strategic options from a corporate finance perspective.

Performance of our picks

Overall, our recommendations have outperformed the benchmark indices on an absolute basis by an average of 23% as at 31 December 2015. The outperformance would have been more pronounced if annualised but we see the computation of such data misleading and academic in nature at best. The 5 buy recommendations generated an average total return (including dividends) of 13.9%. This includes the short term arbitrage of MIIF where profits were locked in after just 2 weeks. Excluding MIIF, the buy recommendations generated average returns of 16.5%. Memstar, our lone sell recommendation, was down 55.0% as at end 2015 before getting suspended for being unable to complete its reverse takeover of Longmen Group, the transaction risk of which we have flagged out multiple times over the course of the year. 

A summary of our performance is presented below accompanied by key updates on selected companies that we have covered:

Figure 1. Our recommendations have outperformed benchmark indices by a significant margin

Abric Berhad- cash realised from impending delisting

Following a year during which Abric has failed to find a suitable acquisition opportunity for it to extend its Bursa listing, the company has announced on 18 January 2016 that it will be going ahead with a delisting exercise. In conjunction with the delisting exercise, the company has announced a cash distribution of RM0.43 per share (vs last traded price of RM 0.48), which we estimate is roughly equal to its cash holdings less all liabilities as at September 2015 on a fully diluted basis. This does not include the approximately RM0.07 cash it was due to receive 12 months after the completion of disposal in December 2014 (i.e. December 2015).

As Abric has already announced its decision to dispose of its remaining assets and voluntarily wind-up, shareholders are expected to be entitled to a further cash distribution post delisting. We think that shareholders should also be able to realise an eventual amount close to the Company’s NAV of RM0.64 per share. With a finely balanced shareholding structure (controlling Ong family owns 35%, super minority Pui Cheng Wui 23% and others 42%, fully diluted assuming full conversion of warrants), minority shareholders can also take heart that their interests should be fairly taken care of post delisting. 

Memstar Technology- RTO woes not over

Memstar’s troubles in trying to complete the acquisition of Longmen Group continues unabated. In our previous report, we questioned Memstar’s over optimistic valuation of the target, then valued at US$420 million. Following the umpteenth supplemental agreement, the acquisition price has been revised downwards first to US$323 million in July, then to US$200 million in December, translating into an eye-popping 52.4% in reduction in value in less than a year! This is accompanied by a loosening in the conditions precedent of the acquisition particularly those pertaining to the Target group’s fund raising obligations. However, given the difficult current market conditions, we are still not optimistic that the conditions can be met even with the significantly lowered bar. And to add to shareholders’ woes, Memstar has suspended trading of its shares yet again on 6 January 2016. 

The only silver lining in all these is in SGX’s decision to grant the Memstar additional time (until end May 2016) to complete the acquisition. We can only hope that Memstar shareholders have taken heed of our multiple warnings and disposed of their holdings in time.

Chuan Hup Holdings- hit mainly by FX losses

When we first recommended Chuan Hup, it was on the back of its extremely robust balance sheet, under-appreciated assets and the possibility of a bumper dividend arising from its disposal of CHO shares to Falcon Energy. While Chuan Hup’s financial strength and asset backing have remained largely unchanged, we were disappointed in the board’s decision not to reward its shareholders with a bigger payout. It did announce and pay a total dividend of 3 cts though for its financial year ending 30 June 2015, representing a yield of almost 10% of the prevailing price when our report was first posted.

Results wise, Chuan Hup continues to be hit by the effects of a strengthening US dollar against both SGD and AUD even if its units’ underlying businesses have not deteriorated as much. PCI, its SGX listed electronics manufacturing arm, for example, recorded a 62% plunge in its latest 1Q16 profit after tax from US$1.6 million to US$0.6 million, largely due to a US$1.5 million foreign exchange loss (vs +US$0.1mil the year before). Strip that out and adjusting for mark-to-market profits/losses and the core profit would have remained almost the same as the 1Q15’s. Similarly, a US$6.1 million hit from foreign exchange losses was the main culprit for Chuan Hup reporting a loss of US$3.9 million for 1Q16 vs a profit of US$3.0 million in 1Q15.

For its joint venture property development projects in Australia, the results have been mixed. Toccata, which has been completed is almost fully sold. We estimate that only 10-15% of the sales have yet to be recognised. Meanwhile, Concerto, the largest of the 3 projects by development value, has sold an additional 50 units over the past 11 months to achieve 68% in total sales. With completion due only in 2017, we believe there is still enough time for the JV to ramp up sales to 80-85% or more, similar to what Toccata achieved at its completion. Sales in Unison on Tenth, however, has made little progress in the last few months in particular and 48% of its units remain unsold despite the fast approaching completion deadline. That said, as we have stressed in our previous report, we do not expect any negative cashflow impact from these projects as Chuan Hup’s main obligations in these is in injecting the land while Finbar contributed the working capital. 

Figure 2. Sales performance of Chuan Hup’s JV development projects have been mixed

As at the latest balance sheet date of 30 September 2015, we estimate that Chuan Hup still holds, after accounting for dividends paid after, adjusted net cash and short term securities worth S$0.194 per share or almost 73% of its last traded price of S$0.265, which should provide a strong buffer against the current market volatilities. 

Pacific Century Regional Development- delisting imminent if share buybacks continue

Since our report highlighting PCRD’s aggressive share buybacks and suggesting that this may be a prelude to majority shareholder Richard Li potentially privatising the company, PCRD has not shown any intent to restrain its share buyback activities. In the past 9 months, the company has acquired a further 89.1 million shares, shrinking the public float to a precariously low 10.2%. We estimate that the company can only acquire and cancel a further 5.1 million shares before its trading has to be halted pending a delisting decision to be made.

Figure 3. Aggressive share buyback from PCRD has shrunk public float precariously close to 10% threshold

To recap a point made in our update report on 5 May 2015:

“Under the current regulatory regime, there are a few ways that PCRD's privatisation could take place: through a general offer, a scheme of arrangement, a voluntary delisting or a forced delisting by SGX due to low free float (<10%) coupled with an exit offer. Based on current circumstances, we see the last two as the most likely options. Both would require a reasonable exit offer to be tabled and the appointment of an independent financial adviser ("IFA") to opine on the fairness of the offer as stipulated in the SGX listing rules. We note that IFAs tend to benchmark fair value of a company's shares to the market prices of its underlying assets where such values are available as in the case of PCRD. As such, we do not expect any exit offer, if it materialises, to deviate greatly from the fair value computed using this methodology in order to obtain a positive recommendation from the IFA.”

Figure 4. PCRD’s key underlying assets, HKT and PCCW, are up 6.9% and 3.5% respectively in the last 3 months and has held up well vs HSI, which declined 17% over the same period.

As at 22 January 2016, PCRD’s stakes in PCCW and HKT, both of which shares have held up well despite the recent market turmoil, is worth a total of S$0.61 per share. While it remains to be seen if the “reasonable” offer by Richard Li comes close to matching the market value of PCRD’s underlying assets in the event the mandatory delisting and exit offer is triggered, we believe that that any IFA appointed will use this as a benchmark to base its recommendation on. Richard Li would thus find it hard to justify offering an amount that is significantly less. With the shares trading at $0.37 as at 22 January 2016, we believe PCRD still has significant upside. 

Closing note

While our first year scorecard has certainly been encouraging, our focus is solely on longer term returns. In that regard, we do not expect our picks to be able to outperform the markets by such wide margins year in year out. However, we are confident that with a relentless focus on value and our core competencies, we would be able to generate a positive return on our picks relative to the market over the long run. 

The intriguing but short shareholders' tussle over CH Offshore Ltd ("CHO") has put the spotlight squarely on Chuan Hup, an undervalued gem long known to value investors but yet attracts little to no analyst coverage. Following its decision to dispose of its entire 24.67% stake in CHO, Chuan Hup stands to reap a windfall of $95.7 million. Its share price has since reacted by adding 11% to close at $0.305 per share on 13 February 2015. With an extremely robust cash-rich balance sheet, key investment holdings in strong cashflow generating entities, prospects of a good dividend payout, we rate Chuan Hup as a good long term buy for investors with a possible short term price catalyst.

Background

Brief takeover tussle

On 9 February 2015, Falcon Energy Group Ltd ("FEG") announced that it will increase its offer for CH Offshore shares to $0.55 per share from $0.495 previously. On the same day, Chuan Hup announced its intention to accept the revised offer after initially rejecting the original and snapping up 0.91% worth of shares in the open market in an apparent attempt to put pressure on FEG. This is close to the 1% it can acquire in any 6 month-period before triggering its own takeover as Chuan Hup and Peh Kwee Chim, its controlling shareholder own more than 30.6% of CHO's total shares (although it was disclosed in the CHO offeree circular dated 8 January 2015 that including associates, this figure is around 35.1%) prior to the FEG offer.

This effectively ended a shareholders' deadlock that has been in existence ever since FEG acquired its original 29.1% stake in April 2010 from Bursa-listed Scomi Marine Berhad (n.k.a. Scomi Energy Services Berhad), who in turn had acquired the same stake from Chuan Hup back in 2005.

Potential Win-Win-Win

FEG finally managed to wrest control of CHO at a reasonable price after initially spending $143.5 million in 2010 to acquire its 29.1% stake at a much higher price of $0.70 per CHO share. The revised offer of $0.55 is at a slight discount to the estimated revalued NTA per share of $0.57 per CHO share (source: CHO offeree circular) as at 30 September 2014. CHO also has an ungeared balance sheet with net cash per share of around $0.13 per share potentially giving FEG flexibility to recapitalise the company and reduce its own upfront cost of funding the acquisition. We expect synergies to be derived from combining FEG's fleet of mainly accommodation barges and rigs with CHO's complementary fleet of AHTS vessels going forward. 

Shareholders of CHO get to exit their investments at a price that has not been reached for more than 4 years even as the share prices of almost all other oil and gas counters have plummeted. (see CHO historical price chart below) Even shareholders who chose not to accept the offer and remain as CHO shareholders can potentially benefit from the operational synergies as described above.

Figure 1: CHO last traded at $0.55 in 2010

Finally, Chuan Hup gets to cash in on its CHO stake for a tidy sum of $95.7 million and turn its focus on other investments amidst a weak current operating environment for CHO's oil and gas services business. Shareholders of Chuan Hup could even be in line for a special bonanza if the board of directors decides to emulate its feat of distributing a bumper 44 cts per share special dividend in FY2006 representing almost 100% of its $485.6 million cash proceeds from the disposal of its marine logistics business along with 49.1% stake in PT Rig Tenders Indonesia and the 29.1% stake of CHO shares to Scomi Marine. For comparison purposes, the $95.7 million proceeds should translate to about 10.2 cts per share if distributed fully. 

Chuan Hup and its treasure trove

Since its establishment in 1970 as a tug and service provider for PSA Corporation in Singapore, Chuan Hup has quietly grown under the guidance of co-founder Peh Kwee Chim into a diversified group with core interests in oil and gas services, property development and electronics manufacturing services. Post CHO disposal, the company is likely to focus its attention on the latter two while seeking out new investments.

PCI Ltd

Chuan Hup's electronics manufacturing business is carried out under SGX Mainboard-listed PCI Ltd (www.pciltd.com), which it successfully made its subsidiary (76.7% owned) following a mandatory conditional offer in May 2011. Despite operating in a tough and competitive industry, PCI has delivered at least 10 consecutive years of profits and has an enviable and uninterrupted track record of paying consistent dividends of at least 3 cts per share for most years in the same period with a total of 10 cts paid for the financial year ending 30 June 2014. 

Figure 3: PCI has maintained positive operating cashflows and high levels of cash for at least the last 7 financial years (Source: company)

PCI also has a very strong balance sheet with no borrowings and cash holdings of $52.9 million (US$39.1 million) as at 31 December 2014 after adjusting for considerations to be received and paid pursuant to its proposed disposal of the Jalan Ahmad Ibrahim property (announced 13 Feb 15) and acquisition of the Pioneer Road North property (2 Jan 15). This forms approximately 62% of its market capitalisation of $85.6 million based on the closing price of $0.43 per share, giving it an enterprise value of just $32.7 million and a very undemanding FY2014 EV/Ebitda of just 3.1 times.  At $0.43 per share, Chuan Hup's stake is worth $65.7 million.

Finbar Group Ltd

Chuan Hup’s other major investment in a listed company is in Perth-based Australian property developer and ASX-listed Finbar Group Limited (www.finbar.com.au), in which it holds a long term strategic stake of 17.5%. It should be noted that even though the stake is less than 20% and Chuan Hup could not equity account for Finbar's share of profits, it is actually the largest single shareholder in the property company.  

Finbar is a leading property developer in Western Australia, particularly Perth, and has a long established track record of 2 decades, having completed 58 projects worth A$2.8 billion.  It also has an impressive streak of having generated 8 consecutive years of net profit growth with an even longer run of increased dividend payments since FY2003. 

Figure 4: Finbar has an impressive track record of generating profits and increased dividends.

Despite being a property developer and consistently paying dividends, the company has also managed to keep its net gearing to a low level of just 7.3% as at 30 June 2014. As at the closing price of A$1.345 per share, Finbar has an attractive dividend yield of 7.4%.  Chuan Hup's stake is worth $56.3 million (A$53.6 million)

Property development in Australia

Chuan Hup currently has 2 property joint ventures with Finbar ("Australian JVs"):

• Symphony City, a 3-phase residential development to be built on the former Australian Broadcasting Corporation site located at 187 Adelaide Terrace, East Perth, Western Australia. The site was acquired by Chuan Hup in 2008 for A$37.6 million. Of the 3 phases (Adagio, Toccata, Concerto), Adagio has been fully sold, completed and earnings mostly recognised in FY2013. Earnings from Toccata (to be completed in FY2015) and Concerto (FY2017) will be recognised in the subsequent years.
• Unison, a residential development to be built on a plot of freehold land in Maylands Perth acquired by Chuan Hup in 2013 for A$16.7 million. The land acquisition was funded by sales proceeds from Adagio. The development consists of 347 residential apartments and 4 commercial lots to be launched over 2 phases, Unison on Tenth and Unison on Kennedy, to be completed in FY2016 and FY2017 respectively.

Under both JV agreements, Chuan Hup contributed the land and Finbar contributed the working capital necessary for the development. There should thus be no further foreseeable capital requirements for Chuan Hup going forward for these JVs. Profits from both developments will only be recognised upon physical completion and settlement of sold apartments.

Based on information from Finbar's website to date, Toccata has sold 68% of its units while Concerto's sales is at 46% (104 of 226 units) since marketing commenced in March and August 2014 respectively. Unison on Tenth has sold 32% of its units (54 of 167) since marketing commenced in early FY2015. 

With a book value carried at cost of just US$33.5 million ($45.4 million) for both Symphony City and Unison, Finbar’s impressive track record, we expect positive contributions from these two projects over the next 3 years despite the current challenging conditions in the Western Australia real estate market. For illustration, Chuan Hup registered a profit before tax of US$19.4 million over FY2013 and FY2014 for its property development segment primarily due to completion of Adagio.

Figure 5: Toccata, Concerto, Unison on Tenth. Sales figures as at September 2014 based on Finbar’s annual report although Finbar's website lists more updated figures. Source: Finbar

Other significant assets:

• A 32.5% stake in Security Land Corporation (SLC), a property developer in Philippines. SLC is majority controlled by Security Bank Corporation of Philippines, a US$ 2.1 billion company listed on the Philippines Stock Exchange, and has a joint venture agreement with Robinsons Land Corporation to construct a high-end condominium within the Makati financial district in Manila. Tower 1 and Tower 2 of the project, named Signa Designer Residences, were 84% and 44% sold respectively as at September 2014. SLC also owns an adjacent office block through which it derives regular rental income.
• Office units in GB building in Shenton Way, Singapore, acquired in November 2014 for $31.7 million as long term investments.

Valuation

Using sum-of the parts (SOTP) method, we derive at a conservative value for Chuan Hup of $0.432 per share. Our valuation pegs PCI and Finbar to their respective market valuations and the remaining assets conservatively at book value, which in the case of the Australian JVs is at cost. The valuation is supported by approximately $0.226 net cash per share, taking into account Chuan Hup's share of the PCI's cash hoard. This is, in our view, reasonable as Chuan Hup effectively controls the use of cash at PCI.

Figure 6: SOTP computation

Recommendation

We believe there is deep value embedded in Chuan Hup which should appeal to long term value investors. In addition, Chuan Hup's shareholders could also benefit in the short term should sales proceeds from the disposal of CHO shares be paid out as special dividends in a repeat of the disposal to Scomi Marine in 2005. The shares are currently trading at a 29.4% discount to its intrinsic conservative SOTP value of $0.432 per share with good downside protection provided by its adjusted net cash per share of $0.226 as well as a decent dividend yield of 3.3%. We are buyers at this price. 

Key Risks

The strengthening US dollar against both the Australian and Singapore dollar has resulted in Chuan Hup being hit by significant foreign currency related losses in recent quarters. We think that this could be a key concern going forward. The weakening Western Australian real estate market could also pose challenges to both its Australian JVs, although this is mitigated by the Australian JVs being carried on its books at cost.  

(All preceding amounts in SGD unless stated, USD:SGD X-rate of 1.3550 and AUD:SGD X-rate of 1.0520 assumed)